martinemonster

I had a conversation with my lovely boyfriend yesterday where we discussed the apperance of Christopher Lee in different movies. We asserted that he was one of the great draculas and that he played the devil in Horror Hotel, but look at how many horrors he's actually played in: http://www.carfax-abbey.com/ActorSearchResults.cfm?ActorVar=79

Kudos for that Lee!

I have finally become one of the people who have read the last potter-book and is now anxiously waiting for everybody else to finish it so I can speak freely.

The new book rocked! But they shouldn't have killed dumbledore. I realize that it was important for harry to come to the conclusion that everyone he hides behind dies, and thus that he should attack outright without the comfort of a bufferzone of flesh. BUT my gut still tells me that they shouldn't have killed dumbledore. I mean, couldn't they just have killed somebody else, like Ginny or something? Dumbledore was one of the coolest characters in the entire book, if not the coolest! Sigh! I did love the fact that he died for nothing since the didn't actually get the horcruxes (or how you spell it) they were after. He weakened himself for nothing. But Snape shouldn't have been evil. What was the point of that? He's been one of the most obvious evil character of the entire series, so it would have been much better had he been good. Points for finally introducing a non-evil Slytherin-character btw. Slughorn is just spiffy!

Christopher Lee should play in one of the Harry Potter movies. I could picture him making a good Mad-Eye Moody, or even Voldemort reborn. The last showdown between the young Potter and the evil Voldemort (Lee) would be magnificient! Someone should tell the castingdirector (and perhaps Lee himself...)