I'm nearly done tagging my old lj posts, and I came over this post here that you guys have to read: A complete toilet guide to Cuba I think it's funny!
On a different note, I just read a disturbing piece of news:
"The truth is that it would be very hard to recast, because Daniel is so famous in the role and is adored by the fans. But if his new image is seen to be at odds with the franchise, then the whole issue would have to be looked at...I guess we always knew that Harry and Daniel would have to grow up, but we hadn't bargained on full-frontal sex scenes. Nor, one imagines, had the star's millions of young fans."
cut from this Daily mail article.
I can't believe they're even considering replacing him in the last two movies. That would be sucky! Just because he's decided to play naked in one movie and a play this year. I mean, come on, it's not like it'd destroy the "Harry Potter" character that Daniel Radcliffe is all butch and manly. He can still pull off "Just Harry", I'm sure. Stupid WB afraid of the little kiddies. Most of the fans are rejoicing, I tell you! (Or at least I am). Points, views, discussion? Do you guys think they'll seriously consider changing actors for Harry?
On a different note, I just read a disturbing piece of news:
"The truth is that it would be very hard to recast, because Daniel is so famous in the role and is adored by the fans. But if his new image is seen to be at odds with the franchise, then the whole issue would have to be looked at...I guess we always knew that Harry and Daniel would have to grow up, but we hadn't bargained on full-frontal sex scenes. Nor, one imagines, had the star's millions of young fans."
cut from this Daily mail article.
I can't believe they're even considering replacing him in the last two movies. That would be sucky! Just because he's decided to play naked in one movie and a play this year. I mean, come on, it's not like it'd destroy the "Harry Potter" character that Daniel Radcliffe is all butch and manly. He can still pull off "Just Harry", I'm sure. Stupid WB afraid of the little kiddies. Most of the fans are rejoicing, I tell you! (Or at least I am). Points, views, discussion? Do you guys think they'll seriously consider changing actors for Harry?
Tags:
From:
no subject
And i seriously doubt this would happen. They were going to get rid of tom felton for the third film, apparantly because he was going to go fishing or something, - but that never happened, did it? or.. i bet he went fishing, but he also took part in the last films.
And some nudity never hurt anybody.
From:
no subject
Do they even KNOW of the millions and millions of fanfics written practically every day about Ptter-chars and their appearantly very..strange...sexlives?
I betcha all these people don't mind in the slightest that ickle harrykins does nudity.
From:
no subject
But they have let the actors age with the characters...and I'm happy they started making the movies when they did, otherwise I'd probably never have started reading HP at all...
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
So this is my "anything that's body related"-icon. yeah. And potter was naked.
From:
no subject
And i think the "felton is leaving" thing was officialish too.
They can't replace him. People would murder them.
From:
no subject
Tagging. I tag and tag and tag, and I've only reached 12/5 2004. What do to. I won't ever finish this process.
From:
no subject
^_~
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I'd do it, (you know, saying "don't do that" is like waving a red flag) but the being at work thing sorta stops me from looking at breasts. ;)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
my arm hurts when i use the mouse.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
You be careful with that arm! *looks at you sternly* No more extra hours for you!
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Well, you know, I'm here to please...
From:
no subject
But then again, why are they worried about little kids seeing Daniel Radcliffe in a full-frontal sex scene? I mean--LITTLE KIDS--PARENTS DON'T LET THEM SEE THAT--and the ones that do, well...I don't think they'd really care either way. *shudders* Personally I say that the only excuse for a recast is if someone dies. *cough* Richard Harris *cough* And that is only in extreme situations.
From:
no subject
And besides, that would just give the two last movies bad publicity...I mean, DanRad is Harry Potter whether the studio, or he for that matter, likes it or not.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I'm intensly good at doing that, that is, I do it all the time. Lately I've been watching Dark Angel and I keep crying out: "Hey, that's this character from BSG, oh, and there's this other character from BSG"...