Harry Potter and a toilet guide to Cuba

[martinemonster]

I'm nearly done tagging my old lj posts, and I came over this post here that you guys have to read: A complete toilet guide to Cuba I think it's funny!

On a different note, I just read a disturbing piece of news:

"The truth is that it would be very hard to recast, because Daniel is so famous in the role and is adored by the fans. But if his new image is seen to be at odds with the franchise, then the whole issue would have to be looked at...I guess we always knew that Harry and Daniel would have to grow up, but we hadn't bargained on full-frontal sex scenes. Nor, one imagines, had the star's millions of young fans."

cut from this Daily mail article.

I can't believe they're even considering replacing him in the last two movies. That would be sucky! Just because he's decided to play naked in one movie and a play this year. I mean, come on, it's not like it'd destroy the "Harry Potter" character that Daniel Radcliffe is all butch and manly. He can still pull off "Just Harry", I'm sure. Stupid WB afraid of the little kiddies. Most of the fans are rejoicing, I tell you! (Or at least I am). Points, views, discussion? Do you guys think they'll seriously consider changing actors for Harry?

Comments

[martinemonster.livejournal.com]

*relearning how to breathe to keep from trying to rip WB to pieces* Good point. There's always rumour like these, but this was a quote from a WB representative. Only reason I could see for why one should change actors for a part is if the actor died. So there.

But they have let the actors age with the characters...and I'm happy they started making the movies when they did, otherwise I'd probably never have started reading HP at all...

[mirazandar.livejournal.com]

they have done it to some extent. not completely. There hasn't been a full film a year.

And i think the "felton is leaving" thing was officialish too.

They can't replace him. People would murder them.